Mudjacking vs.
Polyurethane Foam

Mudjacking

P

50 year history proven success

P

$1,000 to raise

P

Natural product

P

Non-flammable

P

1″ to 1.5″ holes

P

Extra charges are rare! Material is much cheaper and readily available… companies can absorb costs.

P

Material from Michigan (Supports Michigan)

P

Warranty provided

P

“Sub Soils” no matter what material was pumped under concrete, the soil under that still can compact and erode… so why pay more to pump chemicals under your concrete?

    Polyurethane Foam

    O

    10 year history…. but just recently opened to American public. Method & experience is minimal.

    O

    $1,800 to raise

    O

    Oil based product

    O

    Flammable…yes…can catch fire during process if done inaccurately.

    O

    1/2″ holes

    O

    Extra charges are common! Material is so expensive that charge extra if there are voids.

    O

    Material not local

    O

    Warranty provided

    O

    “Sub Soils” no matter what material was pumped under concrete the soil under that still can compact and erode… so why pay more to pump chemicals under your concrete?

    Click here to learn about the benefits of Mudjacking vs. New Concrete!